The BFS website had accumulated years of incremental additions without a corresponding cleanup. Pages went stale, links broke, and navigation was structured around how BFS was organized internally — not how users actually looked for information. Google Analytics confirmed what people were experiencing: large portions of the site received almost no traffic, a clear signal that content wasn't findable.
There was no ownership model, no review cadence, and no shared standard for what a good page looked like. The problem wasn't just the content — it was the absence of any process to keep it current.
Broken and outdated links
Many pages linked to retired tools — including legacy Oracle systems — creating dead ends users had no way to navigate past.
Navigation built for the org, not the user
Site structure mirrored internal BFS departments rather than the tasks users were trying to complete, making information hard to find.
Inconsistent content quality
Pages varied widely in structure, tone, and accuracy. There was no shared standard, so quality depended entirely on which team owned a page.
No maintenance process
Without clear ownership or review cycles, outdated content stayed live indefinitely. The site was impossible to maintain at scale.